This was one of the many laws in Europe that was made to enhance the fight against terrorism. Many people I talked to were not aware of this fact or said that it must be right simply because the government must have a good reason for the law. But as I looked further into the topic I could not find good reasons for many of these laws. An example would be the public call by many politicians for video surveillance everywhere. But how does a surveillance camera help the victims of a terror attack?
Instead of solving the problem of terrorism at the root, many politicians tend to rather work on the surface and come up with laws that are about the symptoms of terrorism. A surveillance camera doesn't prevent a terrorist attack, it just gives the feeling of security.
We can't give up the personal freedom of the individual just because there could be a terroristic attack
-somewhere, somehow at some time.
¹The Directive requires Member States to ensure that communications providers must retain, for a period of between 6 months and 2 years, necessary data as specified in the Directive
- to trace and identify the source of a communication;
- to trace and identify the destination of a communication;
- to identify the date, time and duration of a communication;
- to identify the type of communication;
- to identify the communication device;
- to identify the location of mobile communication equipment.